| Louise & Richard Elliott |
%20CA%202006.jpg) + 12-13 years on me 1 year at Bob Jones University in Greenville SC House wife, Mother of 4 Boys Calvin, Erick, Ryan, Chad Husband Richard aka DICK .. Retired Chief Law Enforcement for the State of CA, Department of Fish and Game: Dick now mows lawns for various Churches and charitable causes for deacon talking points and complains that he is not given more of a leadership role.. Was on several boards of the RCUS and Covenant Reformed Church, as well as North State Schools in Anderson CA, (which my father was also associated with if not the co-founder or founder of years prior*) Dick has sense left those foundations for another group of churches, more along the “Evangelical” line: I am not sure what Church his main affiliation is with but I know he tries to maintain friendly ties with the people in the Reformed Church (Old School) especially if they let him mow their lawn and their son is an author, which fills his need to add talking points to his deacon status and K-9 Meet-n-Greet advantages Richard brags about starting a Church on his “Kitchen Table”: When I asked him the name of the Church he declined to answer: Thus I have named it: “Church of the Kitchen Round Table” May not be overly fond of being called Dick for Richard .. I am using it more often as it seems to suit him with his former “Captain” Status at Department of Fish and Game … Richard's Father and Family's legacy as poachers and as a quasi slum lord, depending on your take of "Community Standards" are also good talking points. I think when DICK gets his deacon promotion: Captain Deacon Dick, has a ring to it the children will remember easily: Richard was known as the personality that would arrest his “own” mother: Yet, his brother in law Larry M who Sexually Molested his own Brother's daughter on the school grounds that he(DICK) was a board member of at the time, is NOT a Registered Sex Offender and has as of March 13, 2007 officiated at local Govt. events (Shasta County Board of Supervisors) offering the opening prayer and performs Weddings under the umbrella as an "Ordained Minister" GO FIGURE! (The Shasta County NAMBLA Voters Block?) COMMUNITY Standards? Richard did not like his father and was quite ashamed of him (I am now gaining a greater understanding as to why) and most of his closest family members as well: One might get a better understanding if they visit the Shasta County Superior Court Records and look up "Elliott" or "McClanahan" and why he would rather meet them at a public park in another county than have a BBQ at his home as his guests: Rumor has it that "Eddie Elliot" (Richards father) even threatened to shoot/kill* a building inspector over issues of the used tires stored on the property or some of the quonset hut duplexes on the "Elliott Estates" in Cottonwood: *Stay Tuned*as I have my doubts in that DICK removed the used tires many years later (alone) and the exact count was 180* Community Standards and all: What I want to know is would 181 used tired in your back yard have been a violation of those community standards? Richard was also not fond of my father and once you get past the fact that DICK would tag along when it served his and his wife's needs to use the church as talking points in gaining social status in the "religious" community and it gave them a "Leg up" in their favorite pastime of K-9 Meet-n-Greet: 9810 Cow Creek Drive Palo Cedro, CA Phone# 530-227-3911 Comments (6)
School Molestation Cover Up
written by Jeff, September 29, 2009
Joe,
You might also want to note that this very same person holds himself out as an "Ordained Minister" Performs weddings in Redding and Shasta County, He even gave the opening prayer for the Shasta County Board of Supervisors on Tue: March 13, 2007: Was the Pastor of Trinity Sovereign Grace Church: All this and he was never reported to the authorities as required by LAW! It is also my understanding that guilt was even admitted! All this while DICK was on the school board and aware of not only the law but the events!
Who MUST Reprort ELDER ABUSE!
written by Natalie, September 30, 2009
Mandated Reporters
Under California law, certain individuals are legally mandated to report known or suspected instances of elder abuse. The following is a partial list of mandated reporters: Physicians and medical professionals Clergy All employees of health care facilities, such as hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, adult day care centers and residential care facilities Any individual who assumes responsibility for the care or custody of an elderly person Any mandated reporter who fails to report elder abuse may be guilty of a crime. (California Welfare and Institutions Code section 15630) To encourage reporting, all reports are confidential and mandated reporters are protected from civil and criminal liability for carrying out their duty as mandated reporters. (Welfare and Institutions Code, Sections 15630(f), 15633.5(b), 15634) Mandated Reporters who fail to report actual or suspected abuse can be charged with a misdemeanor, punishable by a jail sentence, a fine, or both.(Welfare and Institutions Code, Sections 15630(h) and 15634 (d)) Mandated Reporters: If you are a mandated reporter, then you must make a report. Reporting responsibilities are individual. Use the following guidelines. Mandated Reporters MUST report actual or suspected physical and sexual abuse, neglect, including self-neglect, abandonment, isolation, abduction, and financial abuse. Make the report immediately or as soon as possible by telephone. Make a written report within two (2) working days of the event. Use the standard reporting form, SOC 341, "Report of Suspected Elder/Dependant Adult Abuse." A copy of the form is available from DSS.
If I were Terrisa or Bill Allen with the Bank of Stockton or Idda Mae Reed I would be very very worried too!
written by NASGA, October 04, 2009
Financial elder abuse is generally defined as the improper use of a senior’s funds‚ property or assets. Examples include cashing a check without permission, forging a signature, or convincing an elder to withdraw large sums of money and running off with it. Signs of financial exploitation may include sudden large withdrawals of cash, or transferring the title on a bank account to a new acquaintance. SB 1018 states that “suspected financial abuse” occurs when a bank employee observes behavior or transactions that would lead a person with similar training to form a reasonable belief that an elder is the victim of financial elder abuse.
Banking Fraud and Elder Abuse
written by Richard A. Rogan, October 16, 2009
The new law broadened the grounds for financial abuse in two significant ways. First, it added "undue influence" as a basis for proving financial abuse. Under California law, undue influence involves taking unfair advantage of an elder's weakness of mind or the confidence that the elder placed in the wrongdoer. Of course, the concept of undue influence makes sense and is nothing new to California. The statute defining undue influence was passed in 1872 and it has been applied to the financial abuse of elders ever since!! Undue influence provides a victim with ground to rescind the contract and get back the property or money that was taken by a wrongdoer.
In fact, the reason for the underlying transaction is now virtually irrelevant. All the senior now has to show is that the other party knew or should have known that the transaction would likely be "harmful" to the elder. Ironically, the abusers are, once again, the caregivers, usually adult children or other relatives who would rather see Mom or Dad spend their twilight years litigating against the bank instead of making arrangements to pay their debts honorably. Tough times often bring about unnecessary litigation. While our clients try hard to nip these claims before they are brought, it is important to know the rules that now define financial abuse of an elder and to impress upon those who wrongfully try to hide behind these well-meaning laws that the bank is not going to tolerate being abused, either. Contact Richard Rogan Two Embarcadero Center, 5th Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Main: 415.398.8080
Fraudulent Transfers written by Jerry Brown, October 17, 2009
The seriousness of these fraudulent transfers led Congress in 1996 to make a person criminally liable who "knowingly and willfully disposes of assets (including by any transfer in trust) in order for an individual to become eligible for medical assistance" (42 U.S.C.A. § 1320a–7b(a)). A person convicted of this offense may be fined $25,000 and imprisoned for five years.
EMAIL AND FAX TO Edmund G. Brown Jr. Office of the Attorney General of the State of California: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it http://ag.ca.gov/children_seniors.php
Write comment
|
Subscribe to this comment's feed
I remember hearing rumors of this: We never did find out the facts: I also heard that the teacher that did this was fired from another school for being too "Familiar" with some of his girl students! WHY WAS THIS ALLOWED TO HAPPEN AGAIN?? Why was this not reported to the authorities ?